About Me

Name: federal rb
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

We're in Crisis-The One votes Present!

So we're in the middle of our worst financial crisis since the great depression. The federal government is trying to do everything they can to stabilize the economy and the markets. Now say anythin you want about the repeated bailouts, at least there is an effort to do something.
 
But what does Obama say about the AIG bailout, nothing. He can't even take a stand one way or the other. Is this the kind of decisive leadership we can expect if he is our President? This is kindof like not voting yes or no, and voting present to not take a stand. Oh wait, did I hear he has a history of doing just that. 130 times he voted present, unwilling to take a stand on a tough issue. Don't we want our President to have a backbone?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can't we all agree to blame Andrea Mitchell's husband?

Alan Greenspan is lauded as a modern day financial guru. And even though he is no longer the fed chairman he routines grants interviews about the current economy and what ails us. So why doesn't anyone have the guts to ask him why didn't he prevent this from happening. Most people think the President holds the strings to the economy. The fed chairman is most responsible for the economy as a whole. So why did he leave the rates so low that encouraged this rampage? And why isn't he discredited since he presided over not one but two bubbles that burst causing undue hardships on the american people. We shouldn't forget about the tech bubble of 2000 while experiencing the real estate bubble. He can talk about irrational exuberance but there must be sober leadership that acts and helps our economy. Everyone wants become rich overnight, a responsible fed chairman would act and keep the economy on track.
 
So lets stop hearing from Greenspan, he has no legs to stand on. He caused this nightmare.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An arguement that cuts both ways

Obama says that since McCain has historically been a de-regulator that his arguement now for regulation doesn't hold water.
 
So how about Obama's newfound love of tax cuts? I don't believe Obama has ever been for any kind of tax cut, wealthy, middle class or other-wise. So if you've never been for something, Barack then I guess then you are going to raise taxes. It will be worse than Clinton's running on a middle class tax cut in 1192 and then getting elected and then reworking the numbers and seeing we can't afford it. It will be worse, because we've been through this before. We know Barack will not cut taxes. He will raise taxes.
 
Watch those arguements, they cut on both sides of the blade.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NEWSFLASH- Obama votes with Pelosi 99% of time!

I've done a little research and it turns out that Barack Obama votes with the San Francisco liberal 99% of the time. It turns out that we have a 1% chance that Barack will go against the most liberal aspects of his party.
 
And if you're wondering what is the 1% thing in Obama's past that he took a stand against his party. I've taken a little liberty and included his vote while in the Illinois legislature for the vote AGAINST the Born Alive Protection Act. Now if Nancy Pelosi votes for a measure that would protect botched-abortion babies from being killed in a linen closet and Obama is to the left of her than you've got the most extreme stance on abortion ever.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Today's Worst person in the World!

So Keith Olberman excoriates Republicans for using 9/11 for their own political gain, which was the last straw that even his biased network had to fire him from his prized anchors gig. Then he goes on a couple of days later and repeats his berating of Republicans in his special liberal comment.
 
But then MSNBC goes on to replay 9/11 in its entirety, complete with commercial interruptions. So what is worse supposedly using 9/11 for polotical gain or using 9/11 for monetary gain? No doubt the network had to figure out a way to pay for Olberman's extension. So for utter hypocrisy, today's worst person in the world is Keith Olberman.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Sweetie

I have this supposed phony outrage,
 
So he says hey sweetie, I won't even consider a woman that will give me the presidency, this other woman is not qualified because the job she had previous to the one she has now is not big enough for my ego and she can now be compared to a pig wearing lipstick.
 
Democrats beware, you reap what you sow. You have created this politically correct minefield and now Obama, your messiah, just got popped by a mine.And now the media is in knots trying to give context to Obama's remarks. Lets compare another story recently.
 
Some obscure Republican congressman called Obama uppity and the media was all over it. They said historically that word has been said to put Black people in their place. That they shouldn't be upwordly mobile. But the slant of every story was about how black people feel about the word. Did the media try to put the congressman's words into context? No, of course. He was referring to the eilitism of Obama which has been an ongoing theme of attack against Obama. Now how about the woman that have been offended by Obama's repeated remarks, do they slant their stories toward them. No of course it important to show context. Therein lies the media bias.
 
A quick anecdote, I  worked with a man that got fired for telling a group of people, including women, that our meetings have become a sewing circle. So woman have been highly sensitized through the years about attacks based on their genders, so here one right back at you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tired of hearing about Bush's approval rating

We have been hearing about Bush's dismal approval ratings for 2 years now and give the Democrats their due for villifying him.
 
But there are other professions that have even worse ratings than that. The congress, lawyers, the news media. So we should mention this every time when one of them open their mouth.
 
Oh and what do those 3 professions have in common, they are all in control of Democrats.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voters are stupid, eh?

So Obama says that voters have to be stupid to think that Sarah Palin was always against the bridge to nowhere.
 
So someone should have the guts to ask him if he thinks voters are stupid saying that he once considered service in the military. He has written two books about his life, been running for the President for overs two years and now this comes out. No who is saying something that doesn't pass the laugh test.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Defensive Media-It's a Wonderful Life!

Wow, seeing the defensive nature of the media over the last week has been quite a site to see. Howard Fineman exasperated. Olberman and Matthews have been fired as anchors. CNN actually has conservative commentators on the air. Times are changing and the change is good for all of America. Now just imagine if this has happened in 1992, there would be no Fox News, no internet, no talk radio to combat the left leaning main-stream elite media. They will not be able to suppress conservative voices anymore.
 
But we have to give credit where credit is due, the McCain campaign. They have been running a terrific offensive campaign. They didn't let Obama get away with the claim that he will be victimized by some future race card by the McCain camp. And they jumped all over the media over the treatment by the media and liberal bloggers against Sarah. Everyone has heard of the adage that the best defense is a good offense. The McCain camp has played it beautifully so far.
 
Now we just have to keep it going, this is the conservative call to arms(and fingers). We need to get out there and blog our ideas and viewpoints to all the media outlets. They cannot suppress our voices. So write your comments to articles. Write your comments to editors. Set up blog sites everywhere you can. If we put forward our ideas, the liberals will not be able to suppress all of our viewpoints. ( I have experience with this as CNN likes to delete my comments) But if there is a tidal wave of conservative thought then they cannot suppress our way of thinking.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Okay liberal Media, lets ask Malia and Sasha a couple of questions...

Even after the backlash against the liberal media, there have been some reports that reporters and liberal bloggers still want to go after Sarah's daughter. Even today a talking head said that you shouldn't be offended by ANY question, just say that is none of our business and that would be that. One even used the fact that Bristol brought her fiance to the tarmac to greet McCain as an excuse to legitmize any story about her.
 
Well then lets just go back to an interview that the Obama family had with Acces Hollywood, with HIS daughters. By their reasoning that opens up questions to the little innocent daughters. Now I'm sure the liberals don't want questions asked of the little girls, do they? We could ask them about Uncle Rev Wright and how they felt about sitting in the pews and listening to him bashing the country they live in. Or even how they felt about Daddy sitting up and applauding Rev Wright's sermons.
 
I am not a monster, I don't want this, the Obama daughters look really cute and should be off limits. But the libs should remember what kind of election they want this to be. So lets just stick to Sarah's qualifications, like being a Governor and a Mayor and everything else should be off limits. Unless they want some conservative bloggers with no conscious to start digging into the libs family. You reap what you sow.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What a one-two punch!

The MSM has been a twitter about McCain giving up on experience and picking Palin just to shore up his base.
 
Well, looks like McCain has been belittling Obama so much on the experience question that Obama gave up change to defensively pick Biden. (Obama could of just about won it if he had picked Hillary- but he didn't even consider her). NOw that Obama has picked an old Washington insider, McCain has pivoted and stolen change by picking Palin and going back to his roots of being a maverick and reformer.
 
McCain has the street cred to claim the maverick label and Palin also has a claim to this which fits in nicely. Obama's whole basis has been change, but he went against his own motto by picking a Washington insider. Obama let McCain steal the chagne montra.
 
And Palin does more than shore up the base, which she does, but she also gets some disaffected Hillary voters. Don't let the MSM tell you that she will get all the 18 million votes that Hillary received. Nobody thinks that. But in a close election, the margins are what the fuss is for. She will appeal to some women that just don't vote abortion only. Plus now that Obama's campaign attacked her inexperience of being a small town mayor, that fits in with the arguement of elitism against Obama. Sarah now represents small town America against urban Obama, a fight which benefits McCain.
 
Now in a fight everybody remembers the right hook that knocks out an opponent(Palin pick), but you have to also remember the jabs that got your opponent to react and defend(jabs against inexperience) that set up the right hook.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

4,000 Deaths is Nothing Compared to...

The MSM has jumped on the recent spike in violence in Iraq and the horrible milestone of 4,000 deaths of our honorable miltary servicepeople. This is noteworthy and newsworthy. Although I'm wondering why the media goes silent on Iraq when things aren't quite as bad. (Okay, I'm not actually wondering. I know the media is against the war/Republicans and will only promote or suppress something that will hurt this effort.)
 
But why cannot someone tell of some truly horrible statistics of deaths in this country. There is suspiciously no federal statistics of deaths by illegal immigrants. World Net did an artcile about this: Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa. If those numbers are correct, it translates to 4,380 Americans murdered annually by illegal aliens.
That's 4,380 ANNUALLY! Why isn't there more research on this subject? And why isn't there any focus on this side of illegal immigration?
 
My theory is that because the dems and the MSM want to win an election and will even have us lose a war in order for them to gain control. And the reverse is true with the deaths by illegal immigrants. This story would be a bad one for the dems that don't really want border enforcement. That would stop the flow of potential voters, since they get at least 60% of the hispanic vote. Now illegals can't vote, but their children born in this country can and will vote majority democrat. And that's not even mentioning the pandering to the huge population of Hispanic Americans. This is a truly cynical view of the dems, but one that I really believe. That why there is such a push for illegal immigrants to gain driver's licenses. If it were about safety then the dems would want the border totally sealed shut.
 
But back to the increasing number of deaths by illegal immigrants, why can't we ask the Obama and Clinton why 4,000 deaths in Iraq overs 5 years is worse than over 4,000 deaths annually by illegal immigrants. Could it be that deaths in Iraq can be used to get them into power? While the deaths by illegals would hurt them politically. And the next time Obama claims that this issue is divisive and should be treated sensitively beacuse of the spike in hate crimes against hispanics, tell him to back it up with valid statistics and not just rhetoric. I won't hold my breath waiting for the MSM to talk about this facet of illegal immigration, but at least they cannot suppress the views on the internet. Not yet anyway.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'm Diggin' it as He Digs Deeper

Obama went on The View on Friday and said that if Wright had not been retiring then he would have left the church. It is fun to see a politician and his evolving story in a desparate attempt to stop the bleeding. The MSM are already over the story, but it will not end here. First he never heard of those remarks. Then he has heard some offending remarks, but these were just isolated wrong statements, and he cannot disown his preacher. Now he would've disowned him and the church if Wright hadn't been retiring.
Obama: Wright is an “an old uncle who says things I don’t always agree with”
 
Obama:"Had I heard those statements in the church, I would have told Reverend Wright that I profoundly disagree with them," Obama said, adding, "What I have been hearing and had been hearing in church was talk about Jesus and talk about faith and values and serving the poor."
 
Obama:"The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach ... or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign. I made it clear at the time that I strongly condemned his comments. But because Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community, where I married my wife and where my daughters were baptized, I did not think it appropriate to leave the church."
 
Obama: "Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes."
 
Obama: "Had the reverend not retired, and had he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people and were inappropriate and mischaracterized what I believe is the greatness of this country, for all its flaws, then I wouldn't have felt comfortable staying at the church."
 
I missed it when Wright has apologized for all or even any of the comments degrading white people, our government and this country.
 
So when Imus uttered a few bigoted comments he should be summarily fired. When Wright does it, heck the guy is going to retire, so let him stay up there for awhile. I like to take a person at his word, but this is really starting to strain my ability for belief. Or as Hillary would put it, "require the willing suspension of disbelief". And now I am starting to think that Obama might agree with some of the outrageuous statements.
 
Obama has been lauded as a refreshing new candidate, and in some apsects he is. But in others he is just the same candidate as all the other candidates on both sides of the aisle. If his speech, or lecture, about race would have included this:
             "Now this controvercy has come at a really bad time for me personally. I am running as a candidate to bring the country
              together on both racial and partisan terms. And this controvercy does not fit my theme so I would love to ignore it or say
              anything to get it off page one. But since the media would let it go I have to address this nuissance of a story. I cannot
              ignore the fact that I am a black man running for President of the United States. I am ahead in the polls, delegate count,
              and  the popular vote in the democratic primary. I am so close to actually winning the nomination and cannot do anything
              that would potentially derail my campaign. And I am winning ninety percent of the black vote. If I would repudiate Wright's
              character, then that would endanger my lock on the black vote and thus my chances at the nomination. Therefore I choose
              to stand by the man even though I disagree with a few remarks that have caused the controvercy."
Now that would have been brutally honest and he would have had my respect, but the real truth cannot be spoken in our dialogue. I would have gotten out of my own pew to applaud if this would have happened.
 
So if Obama wants to open a conversation on race, then please answer this: If a bigoted white joke about nappy-headed hos should cause someone to be fired, then why should a repeat offending bigoted black Preacher not face the same consequences. I guess the latest message from Obama is now that we should tolerate black bigots as long as sometime in the future they are going to retire. We all know that Imus is old, wasn't retirement in his future?
 
Just another politician that is trying to say anything to get elected. I am anxiously awaiting what he will say next on the subject.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Open question to conservatives...

I am trying to understand the palpable anger directed towards John McCain. I have my theories but wanted to get responses from the conservative blogoshere. I know that his positions in the last deacde have been contrary to conservative views, but why does President Bush get a pass(mostly) while McCain gets the wrath from the right.
 
President Bush has been great to lower tax rates for everyone in the country, a stalwart on the global war on terrorism, and has given us Roberts and Alito. But he also has greatly expanded the scope and money spent on the Federal dept of Education.(not a conservative position) Has established a prescription drug benefit.(not a conservative position) He tried to give us Harriet Myers as he was reluctant to fight the Dems on the appointment of a Supreme court justice. (Okay he received much grief from conservatives over the Harriet Myers attempted appointment) And he was in total support of the illegal amnesty bill that failed in Congress. (And that instigated open warfare with conservatives across the country) But he is still respected and revered out there.
 
McCain seams to get the blunt end of the anger out there. Yes, I realize McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Feingold, and taxes for the rich have not made him a favorite of the right. But to sit out this election or gulp "vote for Hillary". That is total lunacy. I love reading and listening to Ann Coulter, but to argue that she is more conservative than McCain is utter nonsense. So I cannot understand why conservatives are willing to lose this election in order to get a better candidate 4 years from now. The next president might have 2-3 more appointments on SCOTUS and that will affect the country for the next 20-30 years. Let alone the Dems obvious attempt to nationalize our healthcare system. Can we really let the country drift further along towards socialism while waiting for the next coming of Reagan?
 
I am a center-right Rupublican. I am not a squishy Republican as I haven't voted for a Dem since Clinton 92. Please forgive me as I was  young, foolishly idealistic, and too easily swayed by the "this country needs change" pushed by the major media. But after 1 - 2 years of Clinton's malfeasance and the media's slanted journalism, I have awakened and started to think through the positions best suited for our great country. I have sympathetic ear to the downtrodden in our society, but feel the states are better equipped and should take care of our problems. Accessible government is much more valuable than anything the federal govenrment could ever do. So a federalist is the best way to describe my views. And the Republican party is no way close to my views, but they are much better than the Dems central government power grab. I could not think of wasting my vote for the libertarians, while the country elects Dem after Dem. So I have learned to compromise by supporting the closest electable thing. Which gets me back to McCain.
 
Why cannot McCain get all the support from the conservatives out there? My theory is that it is not just his positions, but his attitude. It is one thing to take contrary positions, but another to keep on poking a stick in the eye of the conservatives. Much more style instigation than policy indignation.
 
Do you think when or if the true conservative candidate next comes along that the country will be easier pull in the other direction? Remember that Reagan was going to abolish the dept of Education and that didn't happen. Just imagine what programs a Democratic President will start or enlarge in the next four years. And he/she will have a Democratically controlled congress also. Hillary has said that the country cannot afford all her ideas. And Obama is more liberal than her. Can we afford to wait four years for the next Gipper? Or should we hold our nose and just vote for McCain?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Excuse me, Chris do you lose something?

Okay, we all know the media is in the tank for Obama. They do have a right to an opinion, but seriously can someone talk to Chris Matthews about his love affair with Obama. I know NBC has gone over as an orginization to advocacy journalism, but Matthews has to be the worst offender of a commentator openly rooting for a candidate.
 
He openly admits to getting thrills up his leg when Obama speaks. And yesterday said he gets emotional when he hears him speak. I mean there has to be some 12 step program out there for his condition. And could someone please give him back his panties, as he has thrown them up on the stage to his rock star candidate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive