About Me

Name: federal rb
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Even CNN has reached a new low

So I was scanning today and saw that CNN did a story about the McCain family being descendants of slave owners. So anytime that we are called rasists for bringing up Wright, Raines and Ayers let us not be intimidated. The libs will use any means to win. We should do the same.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Republicans turn their backs on Lincoln

"Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation: conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war. . .testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated. . . can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war.

We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate. . .we cannot consecrate. . . we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.

It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us. . .that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion. . . that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain. . . that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. . . and that government of the people. . .by the people. . .for the people. . . shall not perish from the earth. "
 
It was a rather short address but has become one of the most important speeches in our nation's history. But why, remembering the dead in our civil war? No, it was more about the last two lines, about the rebirth of the nation and that government of the people, by the people, and for the people shall not perish from the earth.
 
So why are these supposed Republicans coming out against Sarah Palin. Supposedly she doesn't have the qualifiucations to even be running for Vice President. She need not apply. Even though the framers purposely left those qualifications low so that we could have people from our midst that could govern us. The beauty of the qualification being so low is that we wouldn't have a ruling class. So people like Biden wouldn't spend their whole lives in our capital governing the whole country. Biden wouldn't even be able to relate to me in anyway.  
 
So when the first of the things Lincoln mentions is the government "of the people",  then Sarah would be the quintessential person that Lincoln would be refrring to. So why Does Peggy Noonan, David Frum, Kathleen Parker (and the list goes on) keep criticizing Sarah Palin as unqualified to be our Vice President. Do we want to choose the White House as some sort of Trivial Pursuit challenge? Some wonk that will know every detail of foreign and international policy. Or is the Presidency more than that? Maybe judgement should be considered as to what they have done then extrapolating what they might do? And if someone has to have a firm grasp on every issue
then why does Obama have 300 advisors?
 
So I stand with Lincoln, we need to get back to a government of the people. Sarah is one of us, that's pretty refreshing in my book.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nickels & Dimes will be the only change we’ll get.

So at the end of this business cycle we have had a rather rough landing. This is what it feels like when a bubble bursts. So what caused the bubble in the first place? The heart of the matter was the Democratic push for sub-prime loans to people that normally wouldn’t have qualified. Fannie and Freddie were the vehicles to make a market for sub-prime loans. A recent estimate released said that non sub-prime loans are being foreclosed upon at a rate of 2%. While the sub-prime loans are being foreclosed upon at over 20%. There is no economy that can withstand a foreclosure rate of 20%.

The Democrats didn’t have their help in this mess. Alan Greenspan kept the fed rates artificially low throughout this real estate boom. He encouraged this irrational exuberance of the real estate market. Somehow he didn’t learn a lesson from the tech bubble just a few years ago. Although he tried to tamper down on the irrational exuberance then, he had all the tools at his disposal to keep this bubble from inflating in the first place. So if there is a market for these loans and people can make money just processing them and not worrying about any consequences then we just pass the problem along. Who cares, I get a commission and Fannie and Freddie are eating these mortgages up.

Then Wall Street got into the act after seeing Fannie and Freddie create the market place. They bought these mortgages (CDOs) as something to be packaged and sold at a profit. But nobody realized, or cared actually, that these CDOs were infected. Hell who cares, the economy is booming. I can buy this house and flip it a week later and earn $50,000 in the process. Or I can refinance this house, buy all kinds of goodies, because my house will increase in value 30% every year and I can keep milking the equity and live like a millionaire. The whole country was giddy, everyone could get rich. There were even shows like Flip this House. This couldn’t go on forever.

Then we have the tip of the lance that burst the bubble. And that tip was the mark to market accounting rule. Not coincidentally this accounting rule went into effect last November at the height of the market. This rule forced companies not to write down the value of the assets at maturity but at the present day value of the assets. That sounds all well and good, but if there doesn’t turn out to be a market for something then the asset is worthless. And the unraveling started last fall and the infected CDOs made their way throughout all our financial institutions. That’s why quarter after quarter the financial companies kept on writing down huge losses. The values of these CDOs were spiraling downward.

So this whole situation was a perfect storm of events that could have been prevented if any of the things above not happened. But they all did and now we’re here in this mess. At least the global capitulation did us a favor by destroying the inflation bug that sprung up with the high price of oil this summer. Now that we have found a bottom in the global lack of confidence of all of our markets, we can get along with the rebuilding of our economy. Or more importantly the start of the new business cycle. The actions taken by the administration over the last weeks, although distasteful to free marketers, has begun to solidify the bottom of the market plunge. And now we have to address the bubble that got us here. The housing market is integral to our economy. If we can put a bottom there then we can address the larger issues to our economy. McCain was right that we have stabilize  hosuing because if we don't make a bottom out this, then we will not be able to grow without housing.

Then the problem will be jump starting the economy or business cycle. How do we do that? Should we tax the rich and give that money to 95% of the people to help them out with their lives? The problem with this approach is that the American people have lived like our Government, well beyond their means. The people will take the money from the rich and pay off their own debts. They’ll go out and buy some essentials at Wal-Mart. That might have a small effect like this past 2nd quarter when our stimulus payments went out and we had a temporary bump in our GDP.

What we need is a pro-growth approach to this economy. We need to create a sustainable growth pattern by creating private sector jobs that puts people to work and gets them to put money into businesses not named Wal-Mart. I am no economist, but it makes total sense to lower the tax rates for companies to attract them to manufacture here at home. And if the market has taken such a beating, wouldn’t we want to attract more investors by lowering the capitol gains taxes? This pro-growth approaches have been offered by McCain are the beginnings of a policy that will work. There is the old adage if you want less of something then you tax it. Then the reverse would be true too. We cannot let Obama highjack this issue with his condemnation of supply side economics. If Obama wins the election and taxes the evil rich people, and keep the taxes high on our companies then we will meander through the next decade like Japan did with crippling low growth. So the tax cut that Obama will have given me will be just chump change.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain should have an ad ready....

McCain should start filming an ad wiht Joe the Plumber tomorrow. It should expilicitly cite Joe's example of Obama's tax plan affecting his desire foir his plumbing business. And then at the end it should say, I'm Joe the Plumber and I approve this message.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mad as hell- Don't try to calm me down!

So the new talking points from the MSM is that McCain and co are stoking fears into their crowds by the terrorist questions and the crowds isolated reactions of calling Obama names. So the Republicans aren't supposed to get angry?
 
Now I did a little research into the vile and disgusting things that have been said about our current President Bush.
 
Al Gore: "He betrayed this country!"
Michael Kinsley: "George Bush is now the closest thing in a long time to dictator of the world."
Noebl peace prize winner Betty Williams:"Right now, I could kill George Bush."
Keith Olbermann:"Fascist Bush engaging in terrorism..."
Hillary Clinton about 9/11 attacks:"What did he(Bush) know and when did he know it?"
George Soros:"Whitehouse guided by supremacist ideology."
 
There are plenty more but here is what those attacks on Bush started from liberals:
10 year old on YouTube...Threatens to kill Bush.
witer to CNN that made its way onto the air:"Bush should be legally waterboarded until he can recite the bill of rights."
Eco-Enquirer:"Did the Bush jets influence the storm Katrina?"
MoveOn:"Bush caused 9/11."
MoveOn.org: compares Bush to Hitler
MoveOn: "What were war crimes in 1945 is foreign policy in 2003."
There was even a Bush assassination film.
 
Is anything that has been said about Obama even comparable to the things that have been said about Bush?
 
But those evil Republicans have to tamper down their anger towards the Democrat. Now we should send a message to McCain, don't listen to the MSM. The want you to lose in a gentlemanly way like Bob Dole did. I would say to McCain, don't even try to calm me down, this is bigger than you or me. This is about the fact the dems and their extensions in the media are trying to take this election. And even worse we are funding Acorn which is actively trying to steal this election by voter fraud.
 
I even bought into keeping this race on a higher plane, I admonished a fellow conservative to not bring up Obama's race. I see I was wrong. The libs have been saying anything they want about Republicans in order to stoke up anger and win elections. Even Obama himself said..."I want you to argue with them, get in their faces."
 
So I say, let the gloves come off. Lets fight fire with fire. And with all the horrible things that have been said about Bush and Republicans, lets say equally offensive things about them.How about...
"Don't let the black candidate steal the election with his Acorn tactics."
"Obama and his gestapo like tactics use Missouri prosecutors to quell free speech"
"Obama's slip about his faith being Muslim, Freudian slip?"
"Obama will let babies die in linen closets."
"Obama must have heard Wright say God Damn America."
"If Obama is friends with a unrepentant terrorist here, then maybe he will be chummy with Ahmadinejad."
 
Now all these things could be argued true about Obama. So if the media has given a pass to the rants about Bush, then we should be able to say equally vile things about Obama. To quote Obama...."I want you to argue with them, get in their faces."
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

At last we have a definition of a community organizer.

So we all have been wondering what a community organizer actually does. There has been much discussed about the fraudulent activities of Acorn. Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, that is what Acorn stands for. Obama worked for Acorn, represented them as a lawyer, and employed their services even in this election cycle and now we are learning about widespread voter fraud perpetrated by that organization.
 
So I'd like to see an ad from McCain's camp directly tie Obama to Acorn and their illegal activities. They are trying to steal the election.Now that is what a community organizer actually does, so now we know.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can someone buy Peggy and the Wash elites a fishbowl?

So I was listening to Peggy Noonan on the Laura Ingraham show this morning and she was talking about the failed presidency of George Bush. She said the democratization of the world has failed and we should've gone after Osama more and not Iraq. I think she has been going to too many dinner parties with her cronies in the elite left media. If I didn't know any better then I could've been listening to an Obama surrogate. Okay lets just remind those conservatives that want to remain on the guest lists of Meet the Press and the other red carpet shows that you have to question a Republican in order to get your remarks heard.
 
I guess we should continue to debate the Iraq war. Was it the right strategy? History will tell for sure, not the pundits that want to stay in good graces with their liberal string pullers. If the Iraq government stands on it's own and becomes a flourishing democracy, will we look back on it as a failure? Can it become a neutral hedge against the forward ambitions of Iran? Will the people of Iran see their neighbors with rights they don't have and not revolt in time?
 
But the biggest reason that the Iraq war was and is a success is this...WE HAVEN'T BEEN ATTACKED SINCE 9/11. We created a fishbowl where we could fight terrorists with our army on a battlefield. We didn't wait to become defensive and let our flight attendants have to be on the front lines in the war. Isn't the adage that the best defense is a good offense applicable here. And if you heard anything from Osama and that is Iraq was the central battleground in the war on terror.
 
So my suggestion is to Peggy and the rest of the elites in our media, go out and buy a fishbowl from a pet store. Bring it home and put it in the center of your living room. Now imagine you have an infestation and you don't where the rodents are in your house. Could it be a sound strategy to put some bait in the fishbowl to attract the rodent and fight them where you can without having to look all over you mansion?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Game play this out...

So when this election cycle started, Obama had a 60% chance of being elected with the conditions and media blowing the winds in his sail. Now with the financial crisis hitting at this moment, I believe that Obama's odds of winning have gone up to about 75 or 80%. It's not like McCain doesn't have a shot but it is getting slimmer.
 
So I would like to put out there whether it would be good to let the economy blow up. Don't let the politicians bailout anything. I know it sounds drastic but would the crashing of the economy be the thing to actually change the government (before anyone charges that I am cruel and untold people would be hurt by the collapse in the market, let them know that I all my money is tied in the market right now-I didn't even sell anything yesterday).
 
I have argued before that conservatives would lose another generation to badly decided SCOTUS decisions like Roe and whatnot. But we might be there anyway, as Obama's odds of winning are good right now. Could the ruination  of the economy be the thing to finally reign in runaway federal spending. So if the total economy collapses then President Obama wouldn't be able to make the changes he wants like nationalizing healthcare et all. Maybe that would even force changes to the social security system? Medicare?
 
Now I'm not an economist, so I wanted to put this out there to all you smart people out there and see what you think. My proposal would be since Republican odds of winning aren't good right now, let's let this thing blow up while severely handcuffing Obama's hands
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wouldn't have been great to see more debates?

Obama didn't want to do these. He didn't want 10 debates with McCain. He only wanted 3 of these. He is trying to run out the clock on this election. I came away from this debate wanting more discussion betwwen the two candidates. What about free trade? What about our immigration policy? How about a debate just on energy? Obama doesn't show leadership he shows cowardice.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iraq has a surplus, maybe Obama would want to raise their taxes too!

So we are struggling here and Iraq has a surplus, so maybe during his visit to Iraq this summer maybe he could have told them that his prescrition for their econmy would be to raise their taxes.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama agrees with McCain 90% of the time.

Time after time, Obama said that he agreed with McCain's positions. He looked weak, while giving McCain his props on most issues.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What would you say to Ahmadinejad?

That line about his meeting with Ahmadinejad and say "No your Not" was the zinger of the night. The lines was about Obama wanting a face to face meeting with Ahmadinejad and what he would say to him when he said that he would wipe Israel off the map.
 
Great line and true too.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Get your keyboards ready

We have to fight the fight that the libs have been winning. We need to be active and make sure that the media and America understands that McCain will win this debate. So get out there and email everyone and let them know how well McCain has done.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey Katie, you had no hard news experience before your job!

So Katie's gotcha question was how being the governor of Alaska and your neighbor is Russia that that doesn't qualify you for being the Vice-President. So how come Katie was even considered for the CBS anchor job coming from her fluff job as Today host?

And enough of this question that Sarah is not qualified for office. The founding fathers said that you have to be 35, a citizen, and born in the US. She is qualified for all three. So if you think you have to have lived in Washington for 20-30 years in order to be considered then that would only enable a sparse few for public office.

The republicans need to fight back harder.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How about those 536 Golden Parachutes

So day after day, week after week, quarter after quarter, fiscal year after fiscal year our government spends more money than they bring in leaving a crushing debt uopn our children. So congress is rightfully troubled by CEO's getting so much money in return for mismanaging the companies they work for. So how about congress forgoing their paychecks until they can balance the budget?  Not to mention most of these members are already rich and don't really need the money.

And for the numbers I am including Republicans, Democrats in congress and the President himself. Lets pass this along that if the congress wants to make performance part of compensation then that should include them too.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »